 
|
Abstract
Students' concept of proof, their appreciation for its
need as well as for its roles, depends on the curriculum, on
the activities students are asked to carry out, on the
questions they are asked and on how they are asked these
questions. It is shown how the empirical approach to
geometry (which is often associated with computer based
dynamic geometry software) can be used as a basis for
creating didactic situations in which students require
proofs. Classroom experiences are reported, which show how
situations arose in which students felt the need for proof
in order to either explain phenomena they couldn't explain
otherwise, or in order to convince themselves of
counter-intuitive results.
|